why would you cat why
This token can be transferred. The creator has given up the power to mint new tokens. Someone can rewrite this token's name, symbol and image after you buy. Guarded.
- Metadata authority — Someone can rewrite this token's name, symbol and image after you buy. read on-chain
- Thin liquidity — There is $22k of liquidity — thin enough that selling moves the price. reported by the market feed
- Freeze authority given up — The creator has given up the power to freeze wallets. reported by the security feed
- Mint authority given up — The creator has given up the power to mint new tokens. reported by the security feed
- Mint cannot be closed — The mint account cannot be closed. reported by the security feed
- Transfer fee is fixed — The transfer fee cannot be changed. reported by the security feed
- Transferable — This token can be transferred. reported by the security feed
What matters here
- No supported control power was confirmed at the block that was checked, but 5 of the checks could not run. That is not a clean result and is not being presented as one.
- A check that could not run is not a check that passed.
- This covers what the contract code allows - not who is behind the project, or what they intend to do.
No public node answered in time for this address, so the checks that need live chain data did not run. This is a problem at our end or at the providers', not a finding about the token.
Open the full evidence and provenance
What we know about this token
How long this has existed
| Domain registered | 13 days ago | from the domain registry (RDAP) |
Controls and behaviour
- Metadata authority — Someone can rewrite this token's name, symbol and image after you buy. read on-chain
- Thin liquidity — There is $22k of liquidity — thin enough that selling moves the price. reported by the market feed
- Freeze authority given up — The creator has given up the power to freeze wallets. reported by the security feed
- Mint authority given up — The creator has given up the power to mint new tokens. reported by the security feed
- Mint cannot be closed — The mint account cannot be closed. reported by the security feed
- Transfer fee is fixed — The transfer fee cannot be changed. reported by the security feed
- Transferable — This token can be transferred. reported by the security feed
Market
| Liquidity across observed pools | $22,047 |
| 24h volume | $324,694 |
| Pools seen | 7 |
| Quoted against | SOL |
| 24h price change | 171.00% |
What this scan does not establish
- How much do the largest holders hold? — no source answered this question for this token, so nothing is claimed either way.
- Is the trading pool locked or burned? — no source answered this question for this token, so nothing is claimed either way.
- This is an automated read of public on-chain data and labelled provider feeds at one moment in time. It is not an audit, it does not execute the contract's logic path by path, and a token can change after it is scanned.
Evidence runs for this address
| Collected | Pinned to | Provider agreement | Assessment at the time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026 | Finalized slot 439206552 | recorded | recorded under an earlier method |
About why would you cat
why would you cat (why) is a token on Solana. Its main trading pair has existed for 13 days on pumpswap. Across 7 observed pair(s), the venue feed reports a price of $0.00008793, $22,047 of combined DEX liquidity and $324,694 of 24-hour volume; the largest single pair holds $20,938. Contract controls, holder coverage, liquidity control and market quality are assessed separately; market activity does not improve or reduce the security-risk assessment.
| Exact address | ESJjRXALCHz2X1rN1djwyUdCwpSYKXM1a15Suugcpump |
| Network | Solana |
| Project website | https://whywouldyoucat.fun/ |
| Main observed pair created | 13 Aug 2026 |
Community notes